Telling Them It's Not Their Fault Is a Strategy, Not a Gesture
By Dean Waye · December 16, 2025
There is a move that changes how a prospect listens to everything that follows, and most people never make it.
It is not a technique. It is not a line. It is a shift in how you frame the problem you are solving.
The move: before you show your solution, give the prospect a credible external reason why their negative present is not their fault.
Why it works
When someone feels blamed for a problem — even implicitly — they become defensive. Defensive listeners do not buy things. They protect themselves.
Most B2B messaging implies blame without meaning to. You are showing up because there is a problem. You are solving the problem. The subtext is that someone created the problem, and the person who created it is the person you are talking to.
Even when that is partially true, leading with it is a mistake. A defensive buyer spends the conversation protecting past choices rather than evaluating your solution. Removing blame removes the defense. When you give the prospect an external, credible, unstoppable reason why they are in the situation they are in — the economy shifted, the category changed, the previous generation of tools was not built for this scale — they can stop defending and start listening.
The external reason has to be real
This only works if the external reason is true.
A customer in suffering mode has usually been through attempts to prevent and mitigate already. Some of those attempts were good-faith decisions that made sense at the time and simply did not work. If that is true, say it. Name the approach that everyone in their situation tried. Acknowledge that it was a reasonable bet. Then show why it didn’t work and what changed.
This is not spin. It’s context. And it makes the rest of the conversation completely different.
What it sounds like in practice
The difference in framing is small. The difference in how the prospect receives it is not.
| Framing | Example language | What the prospect hears |
|---|---|---|
| Implied blame | “Still using legacy approaches never designed for your scale.” | You made a bad choice. Prospect becomes defensive. |
| External reason | “That approach made sense three years ago. Then two things changed.” | I wasn’t wrong. The situation changed. Prospect opens up. |
Those two framings lead to completely different conversations.
Where to put it
The webinar and presentation structure that actually holds audience attention places this moment after the positive future and before the explanation of your solution.
You have shown them what things could look like. They want that. Now they need to understand why they don’t have it yet. The answer is: not because they failed. Because circumstances made it hard. Because the old approach was reasonable. Because the category didn’t have a good answer until now.
Then: here’s how we get there from here.
That sequence — positive future, external blame removal, solution — is more persuasive than any sequence that starts with the product. It works in presentations. It works in longer-form emails. It works in sales conversations when a prospect is feeling defensive about not having solved this sooner.
Why most people skip it
Because it does not feel like a sales move. It feels like a sympathy gesture. And there is a fear that spending time on the prospect’s history is time not spent on the product.
But the sympathy gesture is the sales move. When a prospect feels understood rather than pitched, they are more likely to keep listening. And the more they listen, the more likely they are to buy.
Spend thirty seconds on it. That is all it takes to change the tone of the entire conversation. It is a small investment with a disproportionate return — which is precisely the kind of move most people overlook because it doesn’t feel like enough.